2005 Georgetown University Law Center Advanced Computer and Internet Law Institute
On Friday, March 18, 2005, I presented a speech on the topic of proving electronic transactions. In particular, I argued that lawyers need to involve themselves in the process of designing electronic signature and transaction processes to make it easier to meet the burden of proving the terms and existence of the transaction.
The materials for the CLE are available here formatted as PowerPoint for Web and PDF.
Some of the key resources I used in preparing the presentation are available on line:
The materials for the CLE are available here formatted as PowerPoint for Web and PDF.
Some of the key resources I used in preparing the presentation are available on line:
- Mitigating Threats to RSA Key Generation, CryptoBytes, RSA Laboratories, Volume 7, No. 1 (Spring 2004)
- Specht v. Netspace Comm. Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002)
- Jane K. Winn, The Emperor’s New Clothes: The Shocking Truth About Digital Signatures and Internet Commerce.
- Christina L. Kunz, John E. Ottaviani, Elaine D. Ziff, Juliet M. Moringiello, Kathleen M. Porter, and Jennifer C. Debrow, Browse-Wrap Agreements: Validity of Implied Assent in Electronic Form Agreements, 59 Bus. Law. 279 (2003-2004).
- Christina L. Kunz, Maureen F. Del Duca, Heather Thayer, Jennifer Debrow, Click-Through Agreements: Strategies for Avoiding Disputes on Validity of Assent; 57 Bus. Law. 401 (2001-2002).
1 Comments:
I fixed the Winn link. Badly formed HTML was messing it up.
The Kunz articles are avaialble to me, but some folks are having problems. I'll try to find another location to link to.
Post a Comment
<< Home